Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2017; 23(35): 6448-6456
Published online Sep 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6448
Published online Sep 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6448
Table 4 Comparison of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of recurrence according to pathological type
| Type | Imaging | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) | Accuracy (%) | P value |
| Overall | CT | 97 (58/60) | 97 (58/60) | 97 (58/60) | 97 (58/60) | 97 (114/120) | 0.096 |
| PET/CT | 82 (49/60) | 95 (57/60) | 94 (49/52) | 84 (57/68) | 88 (106/120) | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | CT | 98 (50/51) | 95 (52/55) | 94 (50/53) | 98 (52/53) | 96 (102/106) | 0.035 |
| PET/CT | 80 (41/51) | 95 (52/55) | 93 (41/44) | 84 (52/62) | 88 (93/106) | ||
| Signet ring cell carcinoma | CT | 100 (5/5) | 100 (2/2) | 100 (5/5) | 100 (2/2) | 100 (7/7) | 1 |
| PET/CT | 80 (4/5) | 100 (2/2) | 100 (4/4) | 67 (2/3) | 86 (6/7) | ||
| Mucinous adenocarcinoma | CT | 75 (3/4) | 100 (3/3) | 100 (3/3) | 75 (3/4) | 86 (6/7) | 1 |
| PET/CT | 100 (4/4) | 100 (3/3) | 100 (4/4) | 100 (3/3) | 100 (7/7) |
- Citation: Kim JH, Heo SH, Kim JW, Shin SS, Min JJ, Kwon SY, Jeong YY, Kang HK. Evaluation of recurrence in gastric carcinoma: Comparison of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(35): 6448-6456
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i35/6448.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6448