Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2017; 23(35): 6385-6402
Published online Sep 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6385
Published online Sep 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6385
Agent | Earliest published clinical response | Earliest published objective response | Time to response in most patients1 | Time to futility | Use of therapeutic drug monitoring | Comments |
Mesalazine (oral) | 1 wk[21] | 3 wk[148] | 4 wk | > 12 wk | N | A higher dose may lead to a more rapid response |
Prednisolone (oral) | 2 wk[28] | 2 wk[28] | 3 to 7 wk | 8 wk | N | May take longer for CD |
Corticosteroids (IV) | 3 d[31] | 1 wk[127] | 3-5 d | 7-10 d | N | |
Infliximab (IV) | 1 wk[48] | 8 wk[149] | 2-8 wk | > 6 mo | Y | |
Adalimumab (SC) | 4 wk[59] | 8 wk[59] | 4-8 wk | > 6 mo | Y | Response time better with 160/80 mg vs 40/40 mg induction dosing |
Certolizumab (SC) | 2wk[61] | 10 wk[64] | 10 wk | > 16 wk | N | |
Golimumab (SC) | 6 wk[65] | 6 wk[65] | 6 wk | > 14 wk | Y | |
Certolizumab (SC) | 2 wk[61] | 10 wk[64] | 10 wk | > 16 wk | N | |
Vedolizumab (IV) | 6 wk[78] | 6 wk[78] | 19 wk | 12 mo | N2 | Response time may be better for UC vs CD |
Thiopurines (oral) | 2 wk[80] | 3 mo[88] | > 6-9 mo | Y | Endoscopic response may take much longer than clinical response | |
10 to 12 wk | ||||||
Methotrexate (oral or SC) | 9 wk[111] | 12 wk[110] | 9 wk | > 6 mo | N | Response time and efficacy may be better in 1) CD vs UC, 2) SC vs oral |
Cyclosporin (IV then oral) | 1 wk[127] | 1 wk[127] | 4 to 5 d | > 14 d | Y | |
Tacrolimus (oral) | 2 wk[122] | 2 wk[122] | 2 wk | 4 wk | Y | |
EEN (oral) | 10 d[131] | 4 wk[139] | 3 to 4 wk | 8 wk | N |
- Citation: Vasudevan A, Gibson PR, Langenberg DRV. Time to clinical response and remission for therapeutics in inflammatory bowel diseases: What should the clinician expect, what should patients be told? World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(35): 6385-6402
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i35/6385.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6385