Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2017; 23(34): 6220-6230
Published online Sep 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6220
Published online Sep 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6220
Figure 2 Comparison of the abdominal withdrawal reflex scores after treatment.
A: AWR scores under 20 mmHg CRD stimulation; B: AWR scores under 40 mmHg CRD stimulation; C: AWR scores under 60 mmHg CRD stimulation; D: AWR scores under 80 mmHg CRD stimulation. bP < 0.01 vs normal group; dP < 0.01 vs model group; fP < 0.01 vs sham-HPM group; hP < 0.01 vs DMSO group. AWR: Abdominal withdrawal reflex; CRD: Colorectal distending; NG: Normal group; MG: Model group; SHPMG: Sham-HPM group; MIG: MEK-inhibitor group; DG: Dimethyl sulfoxide group; HPM: Herb-partitioned moxibustion.
- Citation: Li ZY, Huang Y, Yang YT, Zhang D, Zhao Y, Hong J, Liu J, Wu LJ, Zhang CH, Wu HG, Zhang J, Ma XP. Moxibustion eases chronic inflammatory visceral pain through regulating MEK, ERK and CREB in rats. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(34): 6220-6230
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i34/6220.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6220