Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2017; 23(31): 5739-5745
Published online Aug 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i31.5739
Table 3 Univariate analysis of risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis and stone recurrence
VariablePEPNo-PEPP valueStone recurrence n = 7No-stone recurrence n =142P value
n =13n =136
Age in yr60.3 ± 10.761.1 ± 11.30.806959.6 ± 11.460.7 ± 9.90.7760
Sex, male/female8/584/520.77755/287/550.8873
Cholecystolithiasis2 (15.4)39 (28.7)0.48381 (14.3)40 (28.2)0.7118
History of cholecystectomy1 (7.7)13 (9.6)0.78171 (14.3)14 (9.9)0.5319
Periampullary diverticulum020 (14.7)0.28912 (28.6)18 (12.7)0.2378
Billroth II gastrectomy1 (7.7)4 (2.9)0.370605 (3.5)1.0000
Procedure time in min51.3 ± 11.743.6 ± 12.50.034650.1 ± 10.848.1 ± 11.10.6420
Maximum CBD diameter in mm17.1 ± 5.316.7 ± 4.90.780418.7 ± 8.116.7 ± 7.70.5043
Maximum stone diameter in mm17.3 ± 5.116.9 ± 6.10.819419.9 ± 7.715.3 ± 5.10.0246
≥ 167 (53.8)23 (16.9)0.00494 (57.1)26 (18.3)0.0435
≥ 22230.06071 (14.3)4 (2.8)0.2165
No. of CBD stones2.4 ± 1.22.2 ± 1.00.49952.1 ± 1.11.9 ± 1.00.6071
MLT performed3 (23.1)16 (11.7)0.46354 (57.1)15 (10.6)0.0053
Dilating procedure performed6 (46.2)67 (49.3)0.83034 (57.1)69 (48.6)0.6586
ENBD placement time in d2.3 ± 0.52.6 ± 0.70.09602.8 ± 0.72.6 ± 0.70.5010