Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2017; 23(30): 5469-5485
Published online Aug 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i30.5469
Published online Aug 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i30.5469
Ref. | Study design | Population | Main results | Conclusion |
Nutrition | ||||
Sigall-Boneh et al[15] Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014 | Prospective cohort study | 47 patients = 34 children + 13 young adults | Post treatment with 6-wk exclusion diet: access to specific foods + 50% of calories from polymeric formula | Dietary therapy involving PEN with an exclusion diet seems to lead to high remission rates in early mild-to-moderate luminal CD in children and young adults |
Mean age 16.1 ± 5.6 yr | Response in 37 (78.7%) | |||
Remission in 33 (70.2%) | ||||
Active CD (PCDAI > 7.5 or Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≥ 4) | Decrease in CRP and ESR | |||
Normalisation of CRP in 70% of patients entering remission | ||||
Grover et al[16] J Crohns Colitis 2016 | Prospective cohort study | 54 children with CD | Post EEN: | Only complete MH post EEN induction predicts more favourable SR for up to 3 yr |
Age < 16 | Clinical remission (PCDAI < 10) in 45/54 (83%) | |||
At least 6 wk EEN | Biochemical remission (PCDAI < 10, CRP < 5) in 39/54 (72%) | |||
Complete MH in 18/54 (33%) | ||||
Nearly complete MH in 10/54 (19%) | ||||
SR superior in children with MH vs active endoscopic disease: | ||||
P 0.003 at 1 yr | ||||
P 0.008 at 2 yr | ||||
P 0.005 at 3 yr | ||||
Thiopurines | ||||
Stocco et al[23] World J Gastroenterol 2015 | Retrospective cohort study | 12 paediatric patients = 6 CD + 6 UC | NAT1 genotypes (fast enzymatic activity) were associated with reduced TGN concentration | NAT1 genotype affects TGN levels in patients treated with thiopurines and aminosalicylates and could therefore influence the toxicity and efficacy of these drug |
The effect of NAT1 on TGN persists even 1 mo after the interruption of the aminosalicylate | ||||
No effect of the NAT2 polymorphism was observed | ||||
Biologics and biosimilars | ||||
Sharma et al[7] Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015 | IMAgINE-1 study | Paediatric CD population = 192 | Strong positive association between serum ADA concentration and disease remission/response to treatment | Positive association between serum ADA concentration and remission/response in paediatric patients with moderate/severe CD |
Phase-3, randomized, | Higher body weight, baseline CRP, lower albumin, previous treatment with anti-TNF and presence of anti-IFX antibody were associated with increased ADA clearance | |||
Multicentre, double-blind | ||||
Nuti et al[18] J Crohns Colitis 2016 | Prospective cohort study | 37 biologic-naïve paediatric patients with CD | Biological therapy with IFX + AZA was effective in achieving MH (based on change in PCDAI and SES-CD) | Biologics improve mucosal lesions, more effectively if given in combination with immunomodulators. |
Combination of biologics + immunomodulators was more effective than biological monotherapy | MH predicts a better disease course | |||
Improvement of mucosal lesions at 2 yr follow-up was predictive of favourable outcomes | ||||
Fumery et al[33] J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015 | Retrospective population based study (EPIMAD registry) | 27 paediatric patients with CD experiencing IFX failure | Effectiveness and safety of ADA: | Treatment with ADA was safe and effective in two-thirds of patients with pediatric-onset CD and IFX failure |
Clinical benefit: 19 (70%) measured by the physical global assessment score | ||||
Significant decrease in CRP in children responding to ADA (9 vs 15 mg/L) | ||||
Cumulative probability of failure to ADA treatment: | ||||
38% at 6 mo, 55% at 1 yr | ||||
Primary failure: 8 (30%) | ||||
Secondary failure: 5 (26%) | ||||
Adverse effects: 11 (40%) | ||||
Frymoyer et al[38] J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2016 | Monte Carlo simulation analysis constructed using a published population pharmacokinetic model based on data from 112 children in the REACH trial | 1000 simulated children | Trough IFX concentration > 3 mg/mL was achieved at week 14 in 21% for albumin level of 3 g/dL vs 41% for albumin of 4 g/dL | Standard IFX maintenance dosing in children with CD is predicted to frequently result in inadequate exposure, especially when albumin levels are low. |
Dziechciarz et al[34] J Crohns Colitis 2016 | Systematic review of 14 studies | Efficacy and safety of ADA I paediatric patients with CD | Pooled remission rates: | According to low-quality evidence based mainly on case series, approximately half of children with CD on ADA therapy achieve remission during the first year of the therapy with reasonable safety profile |
At 4 wk: 30% (n = 93/309) | ||||
At 3 mo: 54% (n = 79/145) | ||||
At 4 mo: 45% (n = 18/40) | ||||
At 6 mo: 42% (n = 146/345) | ||||
At 8 mo: 57% (n = 20/35) | ||||
At 12 mo: 44% (n = 169/383) | ||||
Primary non-responders: 6% (13/207) | ||||
Severe adverse events: 12% (69/599) | ||||
Conrad et al[39] Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016 | Observational, single-centre, prospective cohort study | 21 paediatric patients (16 CD, 5 UC) with refractory IBD who had previously failed anti-TNFa therapy | Clinical response post treatment with vedolizumab: | |
6/19 (31.6%) at week 6 | ||||
11/19 (57.9%) at week 22 | ||||
Steroid-free remission in 1/20 (5%) at week 6, 3/20 (15%) at week 14 and 4/20 (20%) at week 22. | ||||
Singh et al[44] Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016 | Retrospective review on the experience with vedolizumab | 52 paediatric patients with IBD, 90% of whom had failed ≥ 1 anti-TNF agent | Week 14 remission rates: 76% for UC, 42% for CD, 80% of anti-TNF naïve IBD | Clinical response to vedolizumab in children with moderate/severe CD increases from week 14 to week 22 |
Week 22 remission rates: | ||||
100% anti-TNF naïve vs 45% anti-TNF exposed | ||||
Sieczkowska et al[46] J Crohns Colitis 2016 | Prospective cohort study | 39 paediatric patients: 32 with CD, 7 with UC | Clinical remission: | No differences in treatment efficacy, after switching from IFX originator to its biosimilar |
88% for CD | ||||
Children were switched from IFX originator to its biosimilar | 57% for UC | |||
All patients had PCDAI ≥ 25 at the time of switching | ||||
Thalidomide | ||||
Lazzerini et al[49] JAMA 2013 | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial | 56 padiatric patients with active CD, randomised to receive either thalidomide or placebo | Clinical remission achieved by 13/28 (46.4%) of the children treated with thalidomide vs 3/26 (11.5%) of those who received placebo (P = 0.01) | Thalidomide compared with placebo resulted in improved clinical remission at 8 wk of treatment and longer-term maintenance of remission. |
Almost all had not responded to thiopurines and 35% had not responded to biologics | Responses were not different at 4 wk, but greater improvement was observed at 8 wk in the thalidomide group [75% response in 13/28 (46.4%)] vs 3/26 (11.5%)(P 0.01) | |||
Of the non-responders to placebo who began receiving thalidomide, 11 of 21 (52.4%) subsequently reached remission at week 8 (P = 0.01). | ||||
Overall, 31 of 49 children treated with thalidomide (63.3%) achieved clinical remission | ||||
Mean duration of clinical remission in the thalidomide group was 181.1 wk vs 6.3 wk in the placebo group (P < 0.001). | ||||
Lazzerini et al[50] Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015 | Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial | 26 paediatric patients with active UC, randomised to receive thalidomide or placebo | Clinical remission at week in 10/12 (83.3%) of the children treated with thalidomide vs 2/11 (18.8%) of those who received placebo (P = 0.005) | Thalidomide compared with placebo resulted in improved clinical remission at 8 wk of treatment and in longer term maintenance of remission. |
All patients had had thiopurines and 35% had received prior IFX treatment | Of the non-responders to placebo who were switched to thalidomide, 8 of 11 (72.7%) subsequently reached remission at week 8 (P = 0.01) | |||
Clinical remission in the thalidomide group was 135 wk compared with 8 wk in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). | ||||
New treatments | ||||
Tew et al[11] Gastroenterology 2016 | Retrospective analysis of two cohorts: 1. phase 2 placebo-controlled trial; | 110 patients with UC (cohort 1) and 21 patients including UC and controls (cohort 2) | Increased expression of T-cell associated genes in baseline biopsies of anti-TNF naïve patients who achieved clinical remission in response to etrolizumab | Levels of GZMA and ITGAE mRNAs in colon tissues can identify patients with UC who are most likely to benefit from etrolizumab |
2. observational study at a separate site | Patients with high colonic integrin aE expression showed greater benefit | GZMA is a promising biomarker for etrolizumab response | ||
GZMA expression was different post-treatment | ||||
Sandborn et al[51] N Engl J Med 2016 | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase-2 trial | 197 adult patients with moderate-severe UC | Clinical remission at 8 wk: | Ozanimod at a daily dose of 1 mg resulted in a slightly higher rate of clinical remission of UC than placebo |
16% of patients who received 1 mg of Ozanimod vs 14% who received 0.5 mg vs 6% of those who received placebo | ||||
Clinical remission t 32 wk: | ||||
21% vs 26% vs 6% respectively | ||||
Drop in absolute lymphocyte count at week 8: | ||||
49% from baseline in the group who received 1 mg of Ozanimod | ||||
32% from baseline in the group who received 0.5 mg | ||||
Allez et al[52] Gut 2016 | Randomised, double-blind, parallel group trial | 78 adult patients with CD | No significant difference in change in CDAI from baseline to week 4, between NKG2D group and placebo group | A single s.c. dose of 2 mg/kg anti-NKG2D did not reduce disease activity at week 4 vs placebo, but the difference was significant at week 12 |
Age 18-75 | Significant difference in change in CDAI at week 12 (delta CDAI -55, P ≤ 0.1) between NKG2D group and placebo group | |||
Disease duration ≥ 3 mo | Significant improvement noted in the non-failure to biologic subgroup treated with anti-NKG2D from week 1 | |||
CDAI 220-450 | ||||
CRP ≥ 10 mg/L | ||||
Endoscopic evidence of inflammation |
- Citation: Guariso G, Gasparetto M. Treating children with inflammatory bowel disease: Current and new perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(30): 5469-5485
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i30/5469.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i30.5469