Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2017; 23(28): 5051-5067
Published online Jul 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5051
Published online Jul 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5051
The Wilson-Jungner Screening Criteria | Achieved for Barrett’s oesophagus? |
The condition being screened for should be an important health problem | + |
The natural history of the condition should be well understood | +/- |
There should be a detectable early stage | + |
Treatment at an early stage should be of more benefit than at a later stage | + |
A suitable test should be devised for the early stage | + |
The test should be acceptable | + |
Intervals for repeating the test should be determined | +/- |
Adequate health service provision should be made for the extra clinical workload resulting from screening | + |
The risks, both physical and psychological, should be less than the benefits | + |
The costs should be balanced against the benefits | - |
- Citation: Amadi C, Gatenby P. Barrett’s oesophagus: Current controversies. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(28): 5051-5067
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i28/5051.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5051