Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2017; 23(27): 4968-4977
Published online Jul 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i27.4968
Table 4 Differences between total liver volume and standard liver volume approximated by various formulas
StudyMean SLV-TLV, in cm3Mean error, as %P valueRoot of the mean PRESSICC
Urata et al[11], 199537.456.950.066225.720.668
Johnson et al[23], 2005232.9422.92< 0.001216.790.668
Poovathumkadavil et al[19], 2010169.9610.82< 0.001216.670.686
Lin et al[24], 1998271.5425.74< 0.001225.400.652
Chan et al[25], 20061,2-165.31-10.82< 0.001216.600.686
Yuan et al[26], 20083104.1611.72< 0.001216.030.672
Fu-Gui et al[27], 2009-103.28-5.35< 0.001218.850.686
Our new SLV, 20168.104.170.680219.430.679