Early radiological assessment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with electrochemotherapy

doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i26.4767

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 23, Issue 26

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (8795)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

549

WORD

309

HTML

4803

Figures (1-4)

308

Tables (1-5)

239

Sum=6208

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1027

Download

1560

Sum=2587

Jul 14, 2017 (publication date) through Feb 4, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (54)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2017; 23(26): 4767-4778
Published online Jul 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i26.4767

Table 5 Spearman correlation coefficient for each couple of imaging parameters

		ΔCT maximum diameter (%)	ΔHU (%)	ΔMR maximum diameter (%)	ΔWash-in (%)	ΔWash-out (%)	ΔDt (%)	Δfp (%)	ΔDp (%)	ΔSUVmax
ΔCT maximum diameter (%)	Correlation coefficient	1.000	-0.183	0.227	0.418	0.655^a	-0.273	0.364	-0.036	-0.127
	P value		0.468	0.502	0.201	0.029	0.417	0.272	0.915	0.726
	n	18	18	11	11	11	11	11	11	10
ΔHU (%)	Correlation coefficient	-0.183	1.000	0.027	-0.373	-0.373	0.318	-0.291	0.064	0.758^a
	P value	0.468		0.937	0.259	0.259	0.340	0.385	0.853	0.011
	n	18	18	11	11	11	11	11	11	10
ΔMR maximum diameter (%)	Correlation coefficient	0.227	0.027	1.000	-0.345	-0.082	-0.036	-0.409	-0.391	0.183
	P value	0.502	0.937		0.298	0.811	0.915	0.212	0.235	0.637
	n	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	9
ΔWash-in (%)	Correlation coefficient	0.418	-0.373	-0.345	1.000	0.527	-0.436	0.318	0.209	-0.150
	P value	0.201	0.259	0.298		0.096	0.180	0.340	0.537	0.700
	n	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	9
ΔWash-out (%)	Correlation coefficient	0.655^a	-0.373	-0.082	0.527	1.000	-0.264	0.709^a	0.291	-0.383
	P value	0.029	0.259	0.811	0.096		0.433	0.015	0.385	0.308
	n	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	9
ΔDt (%)	Correlation coefficient	-0.273	0.318	-0.036	-0.436	-0.264	1.000	0.118	-0.164	0.417
	P value	0.417	0.340	0.915	0.180	0.433		0.729	0.631	0.265
	n	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	9
Δfp (%)	Correlation coefficient	0.364	-0.291	-0.409	0.318	0.709^a	0.118	1.000	0.545	-0.400
	P value	0.272	0.385	0.212	0.340	0.015	0.729		0.083	0.286
	n	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	9
ΔDp (%)	Correlation coefficient	-0.036	0.064	-0.391	0.209	0.291	-0.164	0.545	1.000	-0.167
	P value	0.915	0.853	0.235	0.537	0.385	0.631	0.083		0.668
	n	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	9
ΔSUVmax	Correlation coefficient	-0.127	0.758^a	0.183	-0.150	-0.383	0.417	-0.400	-0.167	1.000
	P value	0.726	0.011	0.637	0.700	0.308	0.265	0.286	0.668
	n	10	10	9	9	9	9	9	9	10

^aP < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. CT: Computed tomography; HU: Hounsfield unit; MR: Magnetic resonance; WIS: Wash-in slope; WOS: Wash-out slope; Dt: Diffusivity; fp: Perfusion fraction; SUVmax: Maximum standardized uptake value.

Citation: Granata V, Fusco R, Setola SV, Piccirillo M, Leongito M, Palaia R, Granata F, Lastoria S, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Early radiological assessment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with electrochemotherapy. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(26): 4767-4778
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i26/4767.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i26.4767