Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2017; 23(2): 275-285
Published online Jan 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.275
Published online Jan 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.275
Table 4 Qualitative image analysis and comparison between grades and stages
Grades | ENETS TNM stages1 | |||||||
Total | G1 | G2-3 | P value | Total | I/II | III/IV | P value | |
Size (mm) | 28.7 ± 20.8 | 22.7 ± 17.7 | 36.4 ± 22.1 | 0.017 | 29.9 ± 21.1 | 24.6 ± 19 | 34.9 ± 22.1 | 0.080 |
MPD caliber2 (mm) | 6 ± 2 | 6.8 ± 2.7 | 5.4 ± 1 | 0.256 | 6 ± 2 | 7.7 ± 2.9 | 5.3 ± 0.9 | 0.038 |
CBD caliber3 (mm) | 13.4 ± 3.9 | 18.3 ± 3 | 11.5 ± 2 | 0.151 | 13.4 ± 3.9 | 20.5 | 12.3 ± 2.6 | 0.034 |
ADCL (× 10-3 mm2/s) | 1.29 ± 0.47 | 1.45 ± 0.53 | 1.09 ± 0.28 | 0.003 | 1.31 ± 0.48 | 1.53 ± 0.55 | 1.10 ± 0.25 | 0.001 |
- Citation: De Robertis R, Cingarlini S, Tinazzi Martini P, Ortolani S, Butturini G, Landoni L, Regi P, Girelli R, Capelli P, Gobbo S, Tortora G, Scarpa A, Pederzoli P, D’Onofrio M. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Magnetic resonance imaging features according to grade and stage. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(2): 275-285
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i2/275.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.275