Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2017; 23(18): 3315-3321
Published online May 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i18.3315
Published online May 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i18.3315
Domain | Score | Components |
Distracted care team case | ||
Information gathering | 86% | Verify identity |
Perform timeout | ||
Verify patient history | ||
Relationship development | 68% | Establish rapport with patient |
Acknowledge patient complaints/discomfort | ||
Commmunication | 67% | Asked nurse for assistance with biopsy |
Asked attending for assistance | ||
Communicated needs during scenario (i.e., need for anesthesia, vitals, etc.) | ||
Team management/professionalism | 47% | Did not appear impatient |
Remained neutral during conflict | ||
Clearly communicated need for assistance | ||
Effective management of conflict | ||
Frazzled Intern Case | ||
Information gathering | 32% | Did not use leading questions |
Allowed the intern to speak without interrupting | ||
Relationship development | 68% | Acknowledged the intern's emotions |
Attempted to calm the intern down | ||
Had an accepting and nonjudgmental attitude | ||
Commmunication | 51% | Provided clear explanations and information |
Communicated concern and intention to help | ||
Successfully elicited the intern's question | ||
Team management/professionalism | 73% | Collaborated with the intern in identifying the next possible steps in care |
Focused the discussion on the best interests of the patient |
- Citation: Srisarajivakul N, Lucero C, Wang XJ, Poles M, Gillespie C, Zabar S, Weinshel E, Malter L. Disruptive behavior in the workplace: Challenges for gastroenterology fellows. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(18): 3315-3321
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i18/3315.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i18.3315