Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of detailed structures of pancreatic cystic neoplasms

doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3184

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 23, Issue 17

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (8283)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

657

WORD

314

HTML

4009

Figures (1-2)

301

Tables (1-4)

279

Sum=5560

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

893

Download

1829

Sum=2722

May 7, 2017 (publication date) through Feb 8, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (35)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Prospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2017; 23(17): 3184-3192
Published online May 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3184

Table 3 Comparison of detection rates of papilla/nodule, septum, and pancreatic cystic dilatation in pancreatic cystic neoplasms by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound

	CT	MRI	EUS	P value
	CT	MRI	EUS	EUS vs CT	EUS vs MRI
Papilla/nodule detection rate	5.80% (3/52)	6.30% (4/64)	35.30% (24/68)	0.000^a	0.000^a
Septum detection rate	34.60% (18/52)	46.90% (30/64)	60.30% (41/68)	0.005^a	0.122
Dilated pancreatic duct detection rate	21.20% (11/52)	21.90% (14/64)	11.70% (8/68)	0.163	0.119

^aP < 0.05, there is statistical significance between each other. EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound; CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.

Citation: Du C, Chai NL, Linghu EQ, Li HK, Sun LH, Jiang L, Wang XD, Tang P, Yang J. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of detailed structures of pancreatic cystic neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(17): 3184-3192
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i17/3184.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3184