Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2017; 23(1): 25-41
Published online Jan 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.25
Published online Jan 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.25
Ref. | Type of study | Final diagnosis | No. of patients | E-EUS assessment | Main results |
Giovannini et al[58] 2006 | Prospective | Surgery | 24 | Color pattern | Sn = 100% |
Single center | EUS-FNA | Sp = 67% | |||
Janssen et al[75] 2007 | Prospective | Surgery | 73 | Color pattern | - |
Single center | EUS-FNA | ||||
Săftoiu et al[60] 2008 | Prospective | Surgery | 43 | Hue histogram cut-off value=175 | Sn = 91%, Sp = 87%, PPV = 88%. NPV = 90%, Acc = 89% |
Single center | EUS-FNA | ||||
Iglesias-Garcia et al[72] 2009 | Prospective | Surgery | 130 | Color pattern | Sn = 100%, Sp = 85%, PPV = 90%, NPV= 100%, Acc = 94% |
Single center | EUS-FNA | ||||
Giovannini et al[79] 2009 | Prospective | Surgery | 121 | Color pattern | Sn = 92% |
Multicenter | EUS-FNA | Sp = 80% | |||
Iglesias-Garcia et al[57] 2010 | Prospective | Surgical | 86 | SR = 4.62 | Sn = 100%, Sp = 92% |
Single center | FNA | ||||
Săftoiu et al[59] 2011 | Prospective | Surgery | 258 | Hue histogram cut-off value = 175 | Sn = 93%, Sp = 66%, PPV = 92%, NPV = 68%, Acc = 85% |
Multicenter | EUS-FNA | ||||
Itokawa et al[73] 2011 | Retrospective | 109 | SR=39.08 | - | |
Hocke et al[13] 2012 | Prospective | Surgical | 58 | Color pattern | Sn = 94.7% |
Single center | EUS-FNA | Sp = 33.4% | |||
Follow up | |||||
Figueiredo et al[71] 2012 | Prospective | Surgical | 47 | SR = 8 | Sn = 90% Sp = 75% |
Single center | EUS-FNA | ||||
Follow up | |||||
Dawwas et al[70] 2012 | Prospective | Surgical | 111 | SR = 4.69 (AUC = 0.69) | Sn = 100%, Sp = 16.7%, PPV = 86%, NPV = 100%, Acc = 86% |
Single center | EUS-FNA | Masks elasticity (AUC= 0.72) | Sn = 95%, Sp = 22%, PPV = 86%, NPV = 50%, Acc = 83% | ||
Lee et al[74] 2013 | Retrospective | - | 15 | Color pattern | - |
SR = 0.02% | |||||
Havre et al[54] 2014 | Prospective | Surgery | 48 | SR = 4.4 | Sn = 67%, Sp = 71% |
EUS-FNA | |||||
Follow-up | |||||
Rustemovic et al[93] 2014 | Prospective | Surgery | 149 | SR = 7.59 | Sn = 100% |
Single center | EUS-FNA | Sp = 45% | |||
Kongkam et al[69] 2015 | Prospective | Surgery | 38 | SR=3.17 | Sn = 86%, Sp = 66% |
Single center | EUS-FNA | ||||
Opačić et al[94] 2015 | Prospective | Surgery | 105 pancreatic mass | Hue histogram | Sn = 98%, Sp = 50%, PPV = 92%, NPV = 100%, Ac = 69% |
Single center | EUS-FNA | 44 controls | |||
Mayerle et al[68] 2016 | Prospective | Surgery | 85 | SR = 24.82 or 10 | Sn = 77%, Sp = 65% |
Single center | EUS-FNA | Sn = 96%, Sp = 43% | |||
Follow-up |
- Citation: Seicean A, Mosteanu O, Seicean R. Maximizing the endosonography: The role of contrast harmonics, elastography and confocal endomicroscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(1): 25-41
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i1/25.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.25