Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2017; 23(1): 25-41
Published online Jan 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.25
Table 3 Results of contrast-enhanced harmonics-endoscopic ultrasound assessment for solid pancreatic masses in various studies
Ref.Type of studyContrast agentNo. of patientsMIHypoenhancement as a sign of adenocarcinomaEUS diagnostic rateEUS-FNA diagnostic rate
Napoleon et al[18] 2010EndoscopySonovue350.4Sn = 89%Sn = 79%
PC-18Sp = 88%Sp = 100%
NET-9PPV = 89%PPV = 100%
CP-7NPV = 88%NPV = 54%
Acc = 88.5%Acc = 83%
Fusaroli et al[12] 2010ProspectiveSonovue900.36 radialSn = 96%Sn = 86%
PC-51, NET-13, CP-130.28 linearSp = 64%Sp = 18%
Ac = 82%Ac = 57%
Ang et al[19] 2011Definity29 (PC-16, CP-4, Other-9)0.3Better detection of vascular invasion and tumor margins-
Matsubara et al[20] 2011RetrospectiveSonazoid910.2Sn = 87.5%--
Sp = 77.8%
Hocke et al[13] 2012ProspectiveSonovue58-Sn = 84%Sn = 73%-
Sp = 76%Sp = 61%
Kitano et al[15] 2012ProspectiveSonazoid277 (PC-204, NET-19, CrP-46, Other-8)0.3Sn = 95%-Sn = 92%1
Sp = 89%Sp = 100%
Lee et al[16] 2013ProspectiveSonovue37 (PC-28, NET-5, CP-2)-Sn = 93%--
Sp = 86%
PPV = 93%
NPV = 75%
Acc = 92%
Gincul et al[14] 2014ProspectiveSonovue1000.4Sn = 96%Sn = 95%
(PC-69,Sp = 94%Sp = 93%
NET-10, CP-13,PPV = 94%PPV = 100%
Other-8)NPV = 97%NPV = 100%
Acc = 91%Acc = 86%
Park et al[17] 2014RetrospectiveSonovue90-Sn = 91.9%-Sn = 90%
Sp = 67.8%Sp = 100%
Dietrich et al[21] 2016RetrospectiveSonovue394Sn = 92%--
PC-146
NET-156