Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2016; 22(7): 2349-2356
Published online Feb 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2349
Published online Feb 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2349
Table 2 Each characteristic was evaluated independently for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in the squamous papilloma of the esophagus and other diagnostic groups (%)
Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | |
Whitish color | 79.2 | 18.8 | 59.4 | 37.5 | 55.0 |
Exophytic growth | 66.7 | 81.3 | 84.2 | 61.9 | 72.5 |
Wart-like projections | 87.5 | 68.8 | 80.8 | 78.6 | 80.0 |
Surface vessel crossing on NBI | 79.2 | 75.0 | 82.6 | 70.6 | 77.5 |
Combination of | 62.5 | 87.5 | 88.2 | 60.9 | 72.5 |
exophytic growth, | |||||
wart-like shape and surface vessel crossing |
- Citation: Wong MW, Bair MJ, Shih SC, Chu CH, Wang HY, Wang TE, Chang CW, Chen MJ. Using typical endoscopic features to diagnose esophageal squamous papilloma. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(7): 2349-2356
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i7/2349.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2349