Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2016; 22(5): 1859-1868
Published online Feb 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1859
Published online Feb 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1859
Table 4 Agreement of computed tomographic and laparoscopic staging of M stage (n = 582)
Computed tomography | Staging laparoscopy | ||||||||||
M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | ||||||||
Final stage | M0 | 442 | 2 | 444 | 0 | ||||||
M1 | 121 | 17 | 2 | 136 | |||||||
Acc. | Sens. | Spec. | PPV | NPV | Acc. | Sens. | Spec. | PPV | NPV | ||
M1 | 79% | 89% | 79% | 12% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 100% |
- Citation: Hu YF, Deng ZW, Liu H, Mou TY, Chen T, Lu X, Wang D, Yu J, Li GX. Staging laparoscopy improves treatment decision-making for advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(5): 1859-1868
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i5/1859.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1859