Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2016; 22(46): 10189-10197
Published online Dec 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i46.10189
Table 5 Logistic regressions of predictors of topical hemostat use and transfusion
ParameterPredictors of topical hemostat use
Predictors of transfusion
Odds ratio95%CIP valueOdds ratio95%CIP value
Age group (vs 18 to 44)
75 plus1.030.50-2.120.4214.551.95-10.59< 0.0001
Race (vs caucasian)
Black1.210.75-1.970.2751.971.21-3.190.017
United States geographic region (vs northeast)
South3.672.38-5.650.00041.871.19-2.960.001
Partial hepatectomy (vs lobectomy)1.250.91-1.730.1751.621.16-2.270.005
Primary malignancy (vs metastatic)0.800.53-1.200.2811.541.00-2.380.050
Provider specialty (vs general surgery)
Surgical oncology0.300.20-0.46< 0.00010.650.42-1.010.005
Other specialty0.680.40-1.160.4021.480.85-2.570.023
Case cohort (vs matched controls)2.561.70-3.86< 0.00010.440.27-0.710.0008
Topical hemostat useN/AN/AN/A1.871.33-2.640.0004