Therapeutic efficacy and stent patency of transhepatic portal vein stenting after surgery

doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9822

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 22, Issue 44

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (9599)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

444

WORD

282

HTML

5087

Figures (1-3)

377

Tables (1-3)

266

Sum=6456

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1108

Download

2035

Sum=3143

Nov 28, 2016 (publication date) through Jan 4, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (21)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2016; 22(44): 9822-9828
Published online Nov 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9822

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier results for cumulative patency rates among 22 patients who underwent portal vein stenting. Initial decrease in patency rate occurred within 155 d after procedure. Further decrease in patency rate was not observed during the entire follow-up period. The cumulative patency rate for PV stent was 95.7%. PV: Portal vein.

Citation: Jeon UB, Kim CW, Kim TU, Choo KS, Jang JY, Nam KJ, Chu CW, Ryu JH. Therapeutic efficacy and stent patency of transhepatic portal vein stenting after surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(44): 9822-9828
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i44/9822.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9822