Full-thickness myotomy is associated with higher rate of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease

doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9419

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 22, Issue 42

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (8936)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

582

WORD

304

HTML

3985

Figures (1-4)

269

Tables (1-2)

219

Sum=5359

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1012

Download

2565

Sum=3577

Nov 14, 2016 (publication date) through Nov 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (62)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2016; 22(42): 9419-9426
Published online Nov 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9419

Table 2 Multivariate analyses for risk factors of clinically relevant gastroesophageal reflux disease

Item	B	SE	Sig	OR	95%CI of OR
Constant	8.810	3.261	0.007	0.000
Full-thickness myotomy	1.835	0.806	0.023	6.262	1.289, 30.413
Postoperative 4sIRP	0.769	0.299	6.628	2.158	1.202, 3.877

4sIRP: 4-s integrated relaxation pressure; OR: Odds ratio.

Citation: Wang XH, Tan YY, Zhu HY, Li CJ, Liu DL. Full-thickness myotomy is associated with higher rate of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(42): 9419-9426
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i42/9419.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9419