Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2016; 22(42): 9387-9393
Published online Nov 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9387
Published online Nov 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9387
Table 4 Comparison of treatment outcomes n (%)
ND Group | DD Group | P value | |
(n = 34) | (n = 99) | ||
Procedure time (min), mean ± SD | 71.5 ± 44.7 | 54.2 ± 28.8 | 0.043 |
Rate of stone removal by first endoscopist | 13 (38.2) | 52 (52.5) | 0.150 |
Procedure success rate by first endoscopist | 18 (52.9) | 57 (57.6) | 0.638 |
Rate of final stone removal | 24 (70.6) | 66 (66.7) | 0.67 |
Final procedure success rate | 33 (97.1) | 90 (90.9) | 0.22 |
Complications | 1 (2.9) | 11 (11.1) | 0.136 |
Pancreatitis | 1 | 6 | |
Duodenal bleeding | 2 | ||
Decreased blood pressure | 1 | ||
Hypoxia | 2 | ||
Hospitalization after procedure (d), mean ± SD | 7.1 ± 7.6 | 6.6 ± 6.6 | 0.715 |
- Citation: Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Suzuki R, Konno N, Asama H, Watanabe K, Nakamura J, Kikuchi H, Waragai Y, Takasumi M, Hikichi T, Ohira H. Influence of night duty on endoscopic therapy for bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(42): 9387-9393
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i42/9387.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9387