Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2016; 22(42): 9387-9393
Published online Nov 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9387
Published online Nov 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9387
Table 2 Comparison of patient characteristics
ND Group | DD Group | P value | |
(n = 34) | (n = 99) | ||
Age (yr), mean ± SD | 73.1 ± 13.0 | 72.4 ± 14.3 | 0.801 |
Gender (M/W) | 21/13 | 59/40 | 0.824 |
History of abdominal surgery, n (%) | 7 (20.6) | 18 (18.2) | 0.757 |
Double tract reconstruction, n | 1 | ||
Billroth I | 3 | ||
Billroth II | 4 | 6 | |
Roux-en-Y | 3 | 7 | |
Duodenoduodenostomy | 1 | ||
Transverse diameter of the largest stone (mm), mean ± SD | 10.6 ± 4.6 | 10.3 ± 4.9 | 0.735 |
Number of stones, mean ± SD | 2.8 ± 4.0 | 2.8 ± 3.6 | 1.0 |
- Citation: Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Suzuki R, Konno N, Asama H, Watanabe K, Nakamura J, Kikuchi H, Waragai Y, Takasumi M, Hikichi T, Ohira H. Influence of night duty on endoscopic therapy for bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(42): 9387-9393
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i42/9387.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9387