Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2016; 22(40): 8949-8955
Published online Oct 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i40.8949
Published online Oct 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i40.8949
F0 vs ≥ F1 | ≤ F1 vs ≥ F2 | ≤ F2 vs ≥ F3 | ≤ F3 vs F4 | |
Az value | 0.896 | 0.929 | 0.955 | 0.923 |
Cutoff value | 3.957 | 4.789 | 4.789 | 5.834 |
Sensitivity (%) | 88.9 | 81.8 | 85.7 | 83.3 |
Specificity (%) | 90.9 | 93.8 | 94.1 | 88.4 |
Accuracy (%) | 89.4 | 86.8 | 89.4 | 86.8 |
PPV (%) | 96.0 | 94.7 | 94.7 | 76.9 |
NPV (%) | 76.9 | 78.9 | 84.2 | 92.0 |
- Citation: Fujita N, Nishie A, Asayama Y, Ishigami K, Ushijima Y, Takayama Y, Okamoto D, Shirabe K, Yoshizumi T, Kotoh K, Furusyo N, Hida T, Oda Y, Fujioka T, Honda H. Fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Noninvasive assessment using computed tomography volumetry. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(40): 8949-8955
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i40/8949.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i40.8949