22-gauge core vs 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses

doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8820

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 22, Issue 39

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (8071)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

510

WORD

375

HTML

3983

Figures (1-3)

495

Tables (1-5)

247

Sum=5610

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

884

Download

1577

Sum=2461

Oct 21, 2016 (publication date) through Nov 21, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (26)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Randomized Clinical Trial

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2016; 22(39): 8820-8830
Published online Oct 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8820

Table 4 Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of the 2 needles for the diagnosis of malignancy

	Sensitivity	Specificity	Diagnostic accuracy
All lesions¹
AN	91.5%	71.4%	88.9%
PC	95.4%	85.7%	94.1%
Pancreatic mass²
AN	88.5%	100.0%	89.2%
PC	93.8%	100.0%	94.1%
Lymph nodes³
AN	100.0%	60.0%	84.6%
PC	100.0%	80.0%	92.3%

¹Evaluable cases; AN: 54/56, PC: 51/56;

²Evaluable cases; AN: 37/38, PC: 34/38;

³Evaluable cases; both needles: 13/13. AN: Aspiration needle; PC: ProCore needle.

Citation: Sterlacci W, Sioulas AD, Veits L, Gönüllü P, Schachschal G, Groth S, Anders M, Kontos CK, Topalidis T, Hinsch A, Vieth M, Rösch T, Denzer UW. 22-gauge core vs 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(39): 8820-8830
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i39/8820.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8820