Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2016; 22(39): 8820-8830
Published online Oct 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8820
Published online Oct 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8820
Characteristic | Type of needle (all cases/histology cases) | ||
AN (n = 56/36) | PC (n = 56/36) | P value | |
Needle passes, mean (SD) | 1.5 (0.6)/1.5 (0.7) | 1.7 (0.6)/1.7 (0.6) | 0.14/0.16 |
Cellularity, mean (SD) | 1.7 (0.6)/1.7 (0.6) | 1.1 (0.3)/1 (0) | 0.058/0.0342 |
Cytologic/histologic quality, median (range) | 2.6 (0-3)/ 3 (0-3) | 2.4 (0-3)/3 (0-3) | 0.083/0.49 |
Adequacy for diagnosis, n (%) | 54 (96.4)/35 (97.2) | 51 (91.1)/36 (100) | 0.38/0.99 |
Correct diagnosis1, n (%) | 48/54 (88.9)/30/35 (85.7) | 49/51 (96.1)/34/36 (94.4) | 0.25/0.25 |
- Citation: Sterlacci W, Sioulas AD, Veits L, Gönüllü P, Schachschal G, Groth S, Anders M, Kontos CK, Topalidis T, Hinsch A, Vieth M, Rösch T, Denzer UW. 22-gauge core vs 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(39): 8820-8830
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i39/8820.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8820