Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2016; 22(39): 8790-8797
Published online Oct 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8790
Published online Oct 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8790
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors affecting cytological diagnostic accuracy
Variable | Accuracy | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
P value1 | P value2 | OR (95%CI) | |||
Lesion size | ≤ 30 mm | 74.4% (32/43) | 0.282 | 0.603 | 1.29 (0.50-3.36) |
> 30 mm | 64.4% (38/59) | ||||
Endoscopist | Endoscopist 2 | 71.9% (41/57) | 0.419 | 0.367 | 1.52 (0.61-3.74) |
Endoscopist 1 | 64.4% (29/45) | ||||
Location | Body or tail | 69.8% (30/43) | 0.832 | 0.687 | 1.21 (0.48-3.04) |
Uncinate or head | 67.8% (40/59) | ||||
Needle passes | ≤ 3 | 69.7% (46/66) | 0.753 | 0.233 | 1.81 (0.68-4.79) |
> 3 | 66.7% (24/36) | ||||
Suction techniques | Slow-pull | 90.3% (28/31) | 0.0193 | 0.0053 | 1.91 (1.21-3.00) |
5-mL | 63.2% (12/19) | ||||
10-mL | 58.8% (20/34) | ||||
20-mL | 55.6% (10/18) |
- Citation: Chen JY, Ding QY, Lv Y, Guo W, Zhi FC, Liu SD, Cheng TM. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(39): 8790-8797
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i39/8790.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8790