Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2016; 22(39): 8790-8797
Published online Oct 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8790
Table 3 Cytological diagnostic capacity and specimen quality of the different suction techniques
Slow-pull (n = 31)5-mL (n = 19)10-mL (n = 34)20-mL (n = 18)P value1
Cytological diagnostic capacity
Accuracy28/31 (90.3%)12/19 (63.2%)20/34 (58.8%)10/18 (55.6%)0.0192
Sensitivity15/17 (88.2%)5/12 (41.7%)8/20 (40.0%)4/11 (36.4%)0.0092
Specificity13/14 (92.9%)7/7 (100%)12/14 (85.7%)6/7 (85.7%)0.914
PPV15/16 (93.8%)5/5 (100%)8/10 (80.0%)4/5 (80.0%)0.542
NPV13/15 (86.7%)7/14 (50.0%)12/24 (50.0%)6/13 (46.2%)0.079
Cytological specimen quality
Cellularity score ≥ 222/31 (71.0%)11/19 (57.9%)20/34 (58.8%)13/18 (72.2%)0.598
Blood contamination score ≥ 29/31 (29.0%)10/19 (52.6%)24/34 (70.6%)13/18 (72.2%)0.0032