Diagnostic Advances
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2016; 22(39): 8641-8657
Published online Oct 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8641
Table 2 Best ACC/SENS/SPEC/PRES for HAF-DLac vs other approaches[6,8,17]
MethodologySeverity scenario
MildSevereTotal
HAF-DLac81.2%/76.6%/85.8%/84.3%78.8/73.2/84.4/82.4193.8%/95.2%/92.4%/92.6%90.5%/91.8%/89.2%/89.5%
CurvLac69.8%/64.3%/75.3%/72.2%90.4%/92.5%/88.3%/88.8%84.5%/87.1%/81.9%/82.8%
CurvLBP73.4%/67.2%/79.6%/76.7%89.6%/91.9%/87.3%/87.9%81.7%/83.2%/80.2%/80.8%
ECT71.8%/65.9%/77.7%/74.7%91.2%/92.8%/89.6%/89.9%85.6%/87.5%/83.7%/84.3%