Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2016; 22(38): 8549-8557
Published online Oct 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i38.8549
Table 4 Results of multilevel logistic regression analysis for assessing the interendoscopist variability
Coefficient (standard error)P valueOR95%CI
Adenoma detection ratePatient levelConstant-2.37 (0.356)< 0.0001
Age0.036 (0.006)< 0.00011.0371.025-1.048
Gender (ref = male)-1.019 (0.082)< 0.00010.3610.308-0.424
Endoscopist levelσ2u010.070 (0.032)0.03
Distal adenoma detection ratePatient levelConstant-2.498 (0.369)< 0.0001
Age0.033 (0.006)< 0.00011.0331.022-1.045
Gender (ref = male)-0.932 (0.085)< 0.00010.3940.333-0.466
Endoscopist levelσ2u010.044 (0.025)0.08
Proximal adenoma detection ratePatient levelConstant-4.169 (0.538)< 0.0001
Age0.041 (0.008)< 0.00011.0421.025-1.059
Gender (ref = male)-1.065 (0.127)< 0.00010.3450.269-0.442
Endoscopist levelσ2u010.234 (0.101)0.02
Proximal serrated polyp detection ratePatient levelConstant-4.049 (0.677)
Age0.025 (0.010)0.021.0251.004-1.046
Gender (ref = male)-0.498 (0.150)< 0.0010.6080.453-0.816
Endoscopist levelσ2u010.460 (0.199)0.02