Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2016; 22(37): 8414-8434
Published online Oct 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i37.8414
Published online Oct 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i37.8414
TRG grading system | No. of reports (total 25 reports from 21 studies) | Proportion of poor responders | Lower limit of confidence Interval | Upper limit of confidence Interval |
Mandard | 8 | 34.9 | 22.8 | 49.4 |
Dworak | 8 | 47.4 | 32.5 | 62.7 |
Junker/Muller | 2 | 50.8 | 28.8 | 72.5 |
Japanese | 2 | 35.0 | 20.4 | 52.9 |
Wheeler | 1 | 38.9 | 30.8 | 47.7 |
Bujko/Glynne-Jones | 1 | 22.1 | 15.8 | 30.0 |
Rodel based on Dworak | 1 | 52.2 | 44.9 | 59.5 |
Rodel based on Wittekind (modified Dworak) | 1 | 14.7 | 10.6 | 19.9 |
Cologne | 1 | 7.1 | 3.2 | 14.8 |
- Citation: Siddiqui MRS, Bhoday J, Battersby NJ, Chand M, West NP, Abulafi AM, Tekkis PP, Brown G. Defining response to radiotherapy in rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging and histopathological scales. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(37): 8414-8434
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i37/8414.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i37.8414