Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2016; 22(37): 8414-8434
Published online Oct 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i37.8414
Table 4 Proportion of poor responders in the literature according to regression grades
TRG grading systemNo. of reports (total 25 reports from 21 studies)Proportion of poor respondersLower limit of confidence IntervalUpper limit of confidence Interval
Mandard834.922.849.4
Dworak847.432.562.7
Junker/Muller250.828.872.5
Japanese235.020.452.9
Wheeler138.930.847.7
Bujko/Glynne-Jones122.115.830.0
Rodel based on Dworak152.244.959.5
Rodel based on Wittekind (modified Dworak)114.710.619.9
Cologne17.13.214.8