Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2016; 22(37): 8257-8270
Published online Oct 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i37.8257
Published online Oct 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i37.8257
Ref. | n | Indication | Stricture length (mm) | Thermokinetics power - time | RF sessions | Technical success | Stricture diameter before RF (mm) | Stricture diameter after RF (mm) | Stent patency (d) | Survival (mo) | Complications |
Hu et al[55], 2014 | 9 | 4 postsurgical | - | 10 W - 90 s | 1 | 100% | - | - | - | - | 2 abdominal pain |
3 liver transplant | (5 complete resolution | 2 transient leucocytosis | |||||||||
2 chronic inflam | 4 improvement) | 1 mild pancreatitis | |||||||||
Uppal et al[56], 2014 | 2 | Prehepatic transplant | - | - | - | 100% | - | - | - | 19-35 mo FU | 1 hemobilia |
1 LHD-CHD CC | (No malignancy in explant) | ||||||||||
1 RHD-CHD CC | |||||||||||
Strand et al[57], 2014 | 16 | 13 Klatskin CC | - | 7 W - 90 s | - | 100% | - | - | - | 9.6 | Occurrence/month: |
1 intrahepatic CC | Stent occlusion 0.06 | ||||||||||
2 extrahepatic CC | Stent migration 0.02 | ||||||||||
Cholangitis 013 | |||||||||||
Hepatic abscess 0.02 | |||||||||||
Dolak et al[58], 2014 | 58 | 50 Klatskin CC | - | 10 W - 180 s | 1 | 100% | - | - | 170 | 10.6 | 1 partial liver infarction |
4 PC | (1-5) | 5 cholangitis | |||||||||
1GB can | 2 cholangiosepsis | ||||||||||
1 met | 3 hemobilia | ||||||||||
1 HCC | 1 GB empyema | ||||||||||
1 HCC and CC | 1 hepatic coma (1 death) | ||||||||||
1 left bundle branch block | |||||||||||
Mukund et al[59], 2014 | 8 | Occluded SEMS: | - | - | 1 | 100% | - | - | 114 | No complication | |
4 GB cancer | (1-2) | ||||||||||
2 CC/2 PC | |||||||||||
Mehendiratta et al[60], 2015 | 1 | Ampullary adenoma | - | 7 W - 90 s | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | No complication |
with CBD invasion | (Complete ablation) | ||||||||||
Musquer et al[61], 2015 | 1 | Occluded SEMS | - | 10 W - 90 s | - | 100% | - | - | 180 | - | - |
(CC) | |||||||||||
Sharaiha et al[62], 2015 | 69 | 45 CC | 14.5 | 8 W - 90 s | 1 | 100% | 2 | 4.9 | 96% | 15 for PC | 1 pancreatitis |
19 PC | (3.5-60) | (1-4) | at 30-d FU | 18 for CC | 2 cholecystitis | ||||||
1 GB cancer | 1 hemobilia | ||||||||||
1 gastric cancer | 3 abdominal pain | ||||||||||
3 liver met | |||||||||||
Laquière et al[63], 2015 | 12 | CC | 19.5 | 10 W - 90 s | 1 | 100% | - | - | - | 12 | 1 sepsis |
4 Bismuth I | (10-35) | (1-3) | 1 cholangitis | ||||||||
3 Bismuth II | |||||||||||
2 Bismuth III | |||||||||||
3 Bismuth IV | |||||||||||
Atar et al[64], 2015 | 21 | Occluded SEMS: | - | 10 W - 90 s | 1 | 100% | - | - | 62% | - | - |
11 PC/7 CC | (1-5) | at 90-d FU | |||||||||
1 GB can/2 liver met |
- Citation: Alvarez-Sánchez MV, Napoléon B. Review of endoscopic radiofrequency in biliopancreatic tumours with emphasis on clinical benefits, controversies and safety. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(37): 8257-8270
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i37/8257.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i37.8257