Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2016; 22(35): 7983-7998
Published online Sep 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i35.7983
Published online Sep 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i35.7983
Procedure | Pros | Ref. |
Partial division of puborectalis | Good short-term follow-up outcome | [35-37] |
More effective compared with common non-surgical procedures | [35] | |
Internal Delorme’s procedure | Good long-term follow-up outcome with advantages as low recurrence rate and without complications such as postoperative constipation | [50,53,58,59] |
Suitable for patients with ODS and postoperative risk of fecal incontinence | [50,53] | |
PPH-STARR procedure | Overall satisfaction during postoperative long-term follow-up | [52,56,62-65,83-86] |
Without damage to the anal sphincters | [47] | |
Contour-Transtar procedure | High percent of patient satisfaction during long-term follow-up with advantages such as visualizing the procedure and being suitable for resection of a large volume of prolapsed tissue and without severe complications such as recto-vaginal fistula and fecal incontinence | [41,87,88,91-96] |
With superiority over PPH-STARR procedure | [91] | |
Bresler procedure and liner stapler and bioabsobable stapler line reinforcement material | High percent of patient satisfaction during long-term follow-up with advantages such as being suitable for resection of a large rectocele with a depth more than 4.5 cm, simple procedure and without severe complications such as recto-vaginal fistula and peritoneal perforation | [9,45,48,99,100] |
TRREMS procedure | High percent of patient satisfaction during long-term follow-up with advantages such as being suitable for large prolapses of more than 5.0 cm, a short learning curve and without severe complications | [42-44,101] |
TST-STARR procedure | High percent of patient satisfaction during long-term follow-up with advantages such as being suitable for large prolapses of more than 5.0 cm, a short learning curve, direct visualization during surgery and without severe complications | [11] |
TERP procedure | Good short-term follow-up outcome | [46] |
- Citation: Liu WC, Wan SL, Yaseen S, Ren XH, Tian CP, Ding Z, Zheng KY, Wu YH, Jiang CQ, Qian Q. Transanal surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome: Literature review and a single-center experience. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(35): 7983-7998
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i35/7983.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i35.7983