18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography comparison of gastric lymphoma and gastric carcinoma

doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7787

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 22, Issue 34

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7777)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

414

WORD

217

HTML

3751

Figures (1-4)

484

Tables (1-4)

172

Sum=5038

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1067

Download

1672

Sum=2739

Sep 14, 2016 (publication date) through Jul 17, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (11)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2016; 22(34): 7787-7796
Published online Sep 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7787

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 4 Comparative receiver-operating characteristic curves of SUVmax and SUVmax/THKmax for differential diagnosis between gastric lymphoma and gastric carcinoma. ROC: Receiver-operating characteristic; SUVmax: Maximal standard uptake value; THKmax: Maximal thickness.

Citation: Li XF, Fu Q, Dong YW, Liu JJ, Song XY, Dai D, Zuo C, Xu WG. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography comparison of gastric lymphoma and gastric carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(34): 7787-7796
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i34/7787.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7787