Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2016; 22(34): 7787-7796
Published online Sep 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7787
Published online Sep 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7787
Table 2 Incidence, pattern and intensity of gastric 18F-FDG uptake in patients with gastric lymphomas and gastric carcinomas n (%)
Gastric lymphoma | Gastric carcinoma | P value | |
Presence of gastric FDG uptake | 52 (100) | 72 (98.63) | 0.9571 |
Gastric FDG uptake > liver | 49 (94.23) | 65 (89.04) | 0.8291 |
PET/CT pattern | |||
Type I | 23 (44.23) | 9 (12.33) | 0.0021 |
Type II | 22 (42.31) | 14 (19.18) | 0.0381 |
Type III | 7 (13.46) | 50 (68.49) | < 0.0011 |
SUVmax (mean ± SD) | 13.39 ± 9.24 | 8.35 ± 5.80 | < 0.0012 |
SUVmax/THKmax (mean ± SD) | 7.96 ± 4.02 | 4.88 ± 3.32 | < 0.0012 |
- Citation: Li XF, Fu Q, Dong YW, Liu JJ, Song XY, Dai D, Zuo C, Xu WG. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography comparison of gastric lymphoma and gastric carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(34): 7787-7796
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i34/7787.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7787