Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2016; 22(3): 1131-1138
Published online Jan 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1131
Published online Jan 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1131
Trial | Year | Surgery (node resection) | Locally advanced | Randomization scheme | RT dose | RT technique | Median FU | OS | DFS, PFS | Limits |
SWOG/INT-0116[6] | 2001 | D1 90% | 85% | S-alone vs S + CRT | 45 Gy | 2D | 60 mo | 3-yr: 50% vs 41% (P = 0.005) | 3-yr: 48% vs 31% (P < 0.001) | Low rates of D2 node dissection |
D2 10% | ||||||||||
MAGIC[8] | 2006 | D1 35% | 71% | S-alone vs CT + S + CT | - | - | 49 mo | 5-yr: 23% vs 36% (P = 0.009) | 3-yr: 26% vs 38% (P < 0.001) | Low adherence to post-operative CT |
D2 77% | ||||||||||
NCC, South Korea[19] | 2012 | D2 100% | 98% | S + CT vs S + CRT | 45 Gy | 2D/3D | 87 mo | 5-yr: 65% vs 55% (P > 0.05) | 5-yr: 61% vs 50% (P > 0.05) | Poor accrual |
ARTIST[7] | 2012 | D2 100% | 86% | S + CT + CRT + CT vs S + CT | 45 Gy | 2D/3D | 53 mo | NR | 3-yr: 78% vs 74% (P = 0.086) | Planned events not reached |
- Citation: Agolli L, Maurizi Enrici R, Osti MF. Adjuvant radiochemotherapy for gastric cancer: Should we use prognostic factors to select patients? World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(3): 1131-1138
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i3/1131.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1131