Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2016; 22(29): 6595-6609
Published online Aug 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6595
Published online Aug 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6595
Table 3 Outcome of duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal dissection in a previous multicenter questionnaire survey conducted in endoscopic submucosal dissection expert facilities in Japan
| Ref. | Year | Methods | No. lesions | Perforation | Immediate perforation | Delayed perforation | Delayed bleeding | Surgical conversion |
| Ono et al[46] | 2011 | EMR | 254 | 10 (3.9) | 7 (2.8) | 3 (1.2) | 14 (5.5) | 2 (0.8) |
| ESD | 167 | 42 (25) | 32 (19) | 10 (6.0) | 14 (8.4) | 9 (5.4) |
- Citation: Fujihara S, Mori H, Kobara H, Nishiyama N, Matsunaga T, Ayaki M, Yachida T, Masaki T. Management of a large mucosal defect after duodenal endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(29): 6595-6609
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i29/6595.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6595