Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2016; 22(29): 6595-6609
Published online Aug 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6595
Published online Aug 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6595
Ref. | Year | Methods | No. lesions | Mean tumor size (mm) | En bloc resection rate | Operation time (min) | Perforation | Bleeding rate | Surgical conversion | Prophylactic closure | ||
Hirasawa et al[31] | 1997 | EMR | 14 | 12.7 | 12 (86) | - | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | - |
Ahmad et al[32] | 2002 | EMR | 27 | - | 23 (85) | - | 0 (0) | - | 9 (33) | - | 0 (0) | Several patients with minor bleeding and resuming anticoagulants |
Oka et al[33] | 2003 | EMR, polypectomy | 15 | 9.4 | - | - | 0 (0) | - | 1 (6) | - | 0 (0) | - |
Apel et al[34] | 2005 | EMR | 20 | Median 27.5 | - | - | 0 (0) | - | 2 (10) | - | 0 (0) | - |
Lépilliez et al[16] | 2008 | EMR | 43 | 19.0 | 21 (48.8) | - | 1 (2.3) | Delayed (1) | 11 (25.6) | Intraoperative (6), Delayed (5) | 1 (2.3) | 14 patients in which they were used for hemostasis or prevention by using either hemoclips or APC, no delayed bleeding was observed after the procedures |
Alexander et al[35] | 2009 | EMR | 23 | 27.6 | 18 (78) | - | 0 (0) | - | 1 (4) | Early (1) | 0 (0) | 2 patients with antiplatelet therapy by using hemoclip |
Honda et al[23] | 2009 | EMR + EMRSH | 6 | 7.5 | 5 (83) | 15.8 | 0 (0) | - | 1 (17) | Delayed (1) | 1 (17) | - |
Endo et al[44] | 2010 | EMR | 11 | 9.5 | 10 (90.1) | - | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | - |
Sohn et al[36] | 2010 | EMR, EMR-L, polypectomy | 24 | - | 21 (87.5) | - | 0 (0) | - | 7 (29) | Intraoperative (7) | 0 (0) | - |
Kim et al[37] | 2010 | EMR | 17 | 15.1 | 14 (82) | - | 0 (0) | - | 1 (6) | Delayed (1) | 0 (0) | All cases with hemoclip and injection of 1:10000 epinephrin solution |
Kedia et al[38] | 2010 | EMR | 33 | - | 23 (69.7) | - | 0 (0) | - | 5 (14) | Intraoperative (5) | 0 (0) | - |
Conio et al[39] | 2012 | EMR-C | 26 | Median 15 | - | 30.0 | 0 (0) | - | 3 (12) | Intraoperative (3) | 0 (0) | - |
Min et al[40] | 2013 | EMR | 23 | - | 20 (87) | - | 1 (4.3) | Immediate (1) | 2 (8.7) | - | 0 (0) | - |
Fanning et al[50] | 2013 | EMR | 50 | - | 25 (50) | - | 2 (4) | Immediate (1), Delayed (1) | 20 (40) | Intraoperative (17), Delayed (3) | 2 (4) | |
Maruoka et al[17] | 2013 | EMR (including 7 cases with strip biopsy, 1 cases with ESD) | 26 | 10.0 | 18 (69.2) | - | 0 (0) | - | 12 (46.2) | Intraoperative (9), Delayed (3) | 0 (0) | 19 lesions [19 (73.1)] with hemoclip |
Matsumoto et al[5] | 2014 | EMR | 31 | 11.4 | 26 (83.9) | 13.2 | 0 (0) | - | 1 (3.2) | Intraoperative (1) | 0 (0) | 24 cases of lesions [24 (77.4)] located in bulb and descending part of duodenum |
Basford et al[51] | 2014 | EMR, hybrid EMR-ESD (including 1 case with ESD) | 34 | 25.0 | 17 (50) | - | 0 (0) | 3 (8.8) | Delayed (3) | 0 (0) | 11 (32) of the 34 cases, clip were used to close the mucosal defect | |
Yamamoto et al[4] | 2014 | EMR | 17 | 9.4 | 14 (82) | 9.0 | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | Limited cases of lesions located in the distal of duodenum with hemoclip |
Kakushima et al[54] | 2014 | EMR, polypectomy | 10 | Median 15 | 10 (100) | - | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | - |
Seo et al[41] | 2014 | EMR | 33 | - | - | - | 0 (0) | - | 2 (6) | Delayed (2) | 0 (0) | - |
Park et al[93] | 2015 | EMR | 45 | - | 35 (77.8) | Median 13 | 2 (4.5) | - | 1 (2.2) | Delayed (1) | - | - |
Nonaka et al[29] | 2015 | EMR | 113 | Median 12 | 71 (63) | - | 0 (0) | - | 14 (12) | Delayed (14) | 0 (0) | Immediate prophylactic closure was performed in 99 lesions [99 (81.8)] including 7 ESD cases with hemoclip |
- Citation: Fujihara S, Mori H, Kobara H, Nishiyama N, Matsunaga T, Ayaki M, Yachida T, Masaki T. Management of a large mucosal defect after duodenal endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(29): 6595-6609
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i29/6595.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6595