Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2016; 22(28): 6539-6546
Published online Jul 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6539
Published online Jul 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6539
Table 2 Clinical diagnostic value of adenoma by scope
| Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%)(true positive/all positive) | NPV (%)(true negative/all negative) | PLR (%)(true positive/false positive) | |
| ALL | 61 (51-70) | 79 (69-86) | 78 (68-86) | 62 (53-71) | 2.9 (1.8-4.5) |
| Scope 1 | 53 (39-67) | 87 (70-95) | 86 (69-94) | 55 (41-69) | 4.0 (1.5-10.4) |
| Scope 2 | 68 (55-79) | 74 (60-84) | 74 (60-84) | 69 (55-79) | 2.6 (1.6-4.3) |
| P value for two scopes | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
- Citation: Ashktorab H, Etaati F, Rezaeean F, Nouraie M, Paydar M, Namin HH, Sanderson A, Begum R, Alkhalloufi K, Brim H, Laiyemo AO. Can optical diagnosis of small colon polyps be accurate? Comparing standard scope without narrow banding to high definition scope with narrow banding. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(28): 6539-6546
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i28/6539.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6539