Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2016; 22(28): 6539-6546
Published online Jul 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6539
Published online Jul 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6539
Table 1 Comparing the characteristics of patients underwent standard scope vs high definition scope with narrow band imaging n (%)
Parameters | Standard scope (1) (n = 68) | HD scope (n = 72) | P value |
Female | 41 (60) | 48 (67) | 0.40 |
Age (yr), median (IQR) | 56 (52-61) | 57 (53-64) | 0.70 |
Education | 0.40 | ||
High school and lower | 31 (46) | 38 (54) | |
> High school | 37 (54) | 34 (47) | |
H/o previous colonoscopy | 25 (37) | 19 (26) | 0.20 |
H/o previous colon polyp | 6 (9) | 7 (10) | 0.80 |
Family h/o colon cancer | 22 (22) | 12 (17) | 0.40 |
Indication | 0.20 | ||
Screening | 34 (50) | 45 (63) | |
Diagnostic | 18 (26) | 19 (26) | |
Follow up | 16 (24) | 8 (11) | |
Colon preparation | 0.08 | ||
Good | 63 (93) | 71 (99) | |
Moderate | 5 (7) | 1 (1) | |
Number of patient with polyp diagnosis | 41 (60) | 49 (68) | 0.30 |
Total number of polyps detected, median (IQR) | 1 (1-2)1 | 2 (1-3)2 | 0.20 |
Adenoma detection rate | 23 (34) | 32 (44) | 0.20 |
Advanced adenoma detection rate | 7 (10) | 8 (11) | 0.90 |
Hyperplastic polyp detection rate | 19 (28) | 21 (29) | 0.90 |
Proportion of patients with multiple polyps | 17 (41)1 | 28 (57)2 | 0.10 |
- Citation: Ashktorab H, Etaati F, Rezaeean F, Nouraie M, Paydar M, Namin HH, Sanderson A, Begum R, Alkhalloufi K, Brim H, Laiyemo AO. Can optical diagnosis of small colon polyps be accurate? Comparing standard scope without narrow banding to high definition scope with narrow banding. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(28): 6539-6546
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i28/6539.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6539