Topic Highlight
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2016; 22(25): 5627-5641
Published online Jul 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5627
Table 1 Circulating tumor cells in pancreatic cancer
Ref.Patient characteristicsNumber of patients with PCaControlsEnrichment/isolation methodDetection methodDetection rate
Funaki et al[28], 1996Pre- or post-treatment9NANoneRT-PCR: CEA mRNA33.3% of PCa
Funaki et al[29], 1998Preoperative3NANoneRT-PCR: CEA-mRNA
Miyazono et al[30], 1999Intra-operative2115 HVDensity gradient enrichmentRT-PCR: CEA-mRNA61.9% of PCa
Chausovsky et al[33], 1999Metastatic PCa2822 BDDensity gradient enrichmentRT-PCR: CK20 mRNA78.6% of PCa
Z'graggen et al[124], 2001All stages, preoperative10566 HVDensity gradient enrichmentICC: CK-AE1/AE3Sensitivity: 26%, specificity: 96%
Lukyanchuk et al[34], 2003NA1118 HVDensity gradient enrichmentRT-PCR: CK-20 and PSCACK-20: 19 of 47 (40.4%), PSCA: 22 of 47 (46.8%)
Clarke et al[37], 2003NA1123 HVDensity gradient enrichmentRT-PCR: EGFR mRNA18% of PCa, 0.0% of HV
Mataki et al[32], 2004All stages2015 HV, 15 BDDensity gradient enrichmentRT-PCR: CEA mRNASensitivity: 75.0%, specificity: 94.6%
Zhang et al[35], 2005Stages II and III405 BD, 5 HVNot availableRT-PCR: CK20 mRNA57.5% of PCa
Soeth et al[36], 2005Preoperative154NADensity gradient enrichmentRT-PCR: CK20 mRNA33.8% of PCa
Ishizone et al[38], 2006All stages5510 CP, 70 HVDensity gradient enrichmentRT-PCR: a4GnT76.4% of PCa, 40.0% of CP, 17.1% of HV
Hoffmann et al[39], 2007All stages3716 CP, 15 BDDensity gradient enrichmentRT-PCR: CK-19 mRNA64% of PCa
Kurihara et al[41], 2008Stages II, III and IV2611 CP, 10 HVCELLSEARCH®42% of PCa
Zhou et al[40], 2011All stages2515 BDImmunomagnetic separationRT-PCR: C-MET, h-TERT, CK20, and CEASensitivity: 100%, specificity: 93.3%
Khoja et al[125], 2012Stages III and IV54 PCaNASize-based selectionRT-PCR: EpCAM, CK, vimentin, and CEAISET 49/54 (93%) vs CELLSEARCH® 21/54 (40%)
de Albuquerque et al[126], 2012Stages III and IV3440 HVImmunomagnetic separationRT-PCR: KRT19, MUC1, EpCAM, CEACAM5, and BIRC5Sensitivity: 47.1%, specificity: 100%
Kamande et al[127], 2013All stages125 HVMicrofluidic; ICCDAPI+, CD45-, CK+100% of PCa
Bidard et al[42], 2013Locally advanced PCa79NACELLSEARCH®11% of PCa
Iwanicki-Caron et al[43], 2013All stages40NASize-based selectionCell size and cytopathologic criteriaSensitivity: 55.5%, specificity: 100%, accuracy: 70%
Bobek et al[45], 2014All stages24NASize-based selectionDAPI, CK, CEA, vimentin IHC66.7% of PCa
Sheng et al[48], 2014Metastatic PCa18NAMultifluidic, "GEM"Chip94.4% of PCa
Rhim et al[47], 2014All stages1119 HVGeometrically enhanced differential immunocaptureICC for DAPI, CD45, CK, and PDX-173% of PCa
Catenacci et al[128], 2015Stages II, III and IV18NAImmune-magnetic separationCD45-negative and positive for CK8, -18, and/or -19 and DAPI118.4 ± 36.8 CTCs/7.5 mL PVB, compared with a mean of 0.8 ± 0.4 CTCs/7.5 mL PB
Earl et al[81], 2015All stages35NACELLSEARCH®20% of PCa
Cauley et al[44], 2015All stages1059 HVSize-based selectionCytomorphologic criteria48.6% of PCa
Kulemann et al[46], 2015Preoperative119 HVSize-based selection: ScreenCellCytologic and detection of KRAS mutation75% of early PCa, 71.4% of advanced PCa
Zhang et al[129], 2015All stages3230 HVICC and FISHDAPI+, CD45-, and CK+, or CEP8 > 2+Sensitivity: 63.6%, specificity: 94.4%
Bissolati et al[130], 2015Intra-operative20NACELLSEARCH®PVB: 40%, PB: 20%
Zhang et al[131], 20151515 HVImmunomagnetic separationBC-15 aptamer or anti-CK staining73.3% of PCa