Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2016; 22(20): 4918-4925
Published online May 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4918
Published online May 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4918
PD (n = 22) | ||||
Factor | n | Pre-Treatment | Post-treatment | P value |
HREM1 | ||||
TBE | ||||
Height at 1 min (cm) | 22 | 10.2 (7.0, 13.6) | 8.0 (5.8, 11.0) | 0.11 |
Width at 1 min (cm) | 22 | 3.4 (2.5, 4.0) | 2.0 (1.5, 2.5) | < 0.001 |
Volume at 1 min (cc) | 22 | 67.3 (44.0, 126.2) | 25.4 (14.1, 41.7) | < 0.001 |
Height at 5 min (cm) | 20 | 6.5 (4.0, 10.5) | 2.2 (0.00, 6.5) | 0.026 |
Width at 5 min (cm) | 20 | 2.7 (2.0, 3.6) | 1.05 (0.00, 2.6) | < 0.001 |
Volume at 5 min (cc) | 20 | 40.8 (15.5, 73.1) | 4.1 (0.00, 30.2) | 0.001 |
LHM (n = 142) | ||||
Factor | ||||
HREM | ||||
Basal mean pressure (mmHg) | 86 | 40.5 (27.2, 51.7) | 14.5 (7.6, 22.7) | < 0.001 |
LES-IRP pressure (mmHg) | 92 | 24.0 (17.5, 34.4) | 7.1 (3.9, 10.7) | < 0.001 |
TBE | ||||
Height at 1 min (cm) | 133 | 9.5 (7.2, 15.0) | 6.7 (4.5, 10.2) | < 0.001 |
Width at 1 min (cm) | 133 | 3.0 (2.5, 4.0) | 2.0 (1.2, 2.5) | < 0.001 |
Volume at 1 min (cc) | 133 | 71.6 (41.1, 131.9) | 20.4 (6.0, 49.8) | < 0.001 |
Height at 5 min (cm) | 131 | 8.0 (5.0, 12.5) | 2.5 (0.00, 6.2) | < 0.001 |
Width at 5 min (cm) | 131 | 2.5 (2.0, 3.7) | 1.00 (0.00, 2.1) | < 0.001 |
Volume at 5 min (cc) | 131 | 49.1 (15.7, 91.6) | 2.7 (0.00, 21.2) | < 0.001 |
POEM (n = 36) | ||||
Factor | ||||
Eckardt score | 36 | 6.5 (5.0, 8.0) | 1.00 (0.00, 2.0) | < 0.001 |
HREM | ||||
Basal mean pressure (mmHg) | 24 | 38.7 (27.0, 48.7) | 11.4 (8.2, 20.2) | < 0.001 |
LES-IRP pressure (mmHg) | 26 | 23.6 (20.2, 33.4) | 6.6 (3.3, 11.1) | < 0.001 |
TBE | ||||
Height at 1 min (cm) | 34 | 9.8 (4.0, 14.5) | 6.3 (2.1, 9.5) | 0.01 |
Width at 1 min (cm) | 34 | 3.4 (2.0, 4.4) | 1.6 (0.50, 2.5) | < 0.001 |
Volume at 1 min (cc) | 34 | 52.8 (37.7, 119.2) | 12.8 (0.79, 47.7) | < 0.001 |
Height at 5 min (cm) | 34 | 5.3 (2.5, 10.0) | 2.3 (0.00, 6.9) | 0.017 |
Width at 5 min (cm) | 34 | 2.5 (1.5, 4.0) | 0.50 (0.00, 2.0) | < 0.001 |
Volume at 5 min (cc) | 34 | 25.4 (11.3, 62.8) | 0.54 (0.00, 18.8) | 0.003 |
- Citation: Sanaka MR, Hayat U, Thota PN, Jegadeesan R, Ray M, Gabbard SL, Wadhwa N, Lopez R, Baker ME, Murthy S, Raja S. Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs other achalasia treatments in improving esophageal function. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(20): 4918-4925
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i20/4918.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4918