Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2016; 22(20): 4891-4900
Published online May 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4891
Published online May 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4891
Table 2 Summarizing table of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predicting value and accuracy of axial and multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography images in correctly identify the involvement of the mesorectal fascia in comparison of magnetic resonance imaging
Axial CT images | ||||
Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy |
80.40% | 75% | 80.4% | 75% | 78% |
MPR CT images | ||||
Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy |
88% | 87.5% | 90% | 85.36% | 88% |
- Citation: Ippolito D, Drago SG, Franzesi CT, Fior D, Sironi S. Rectal cancer staging: Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnostic accuracy in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(20): 4891-4900
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i20/4891.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4891