Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2016; 22(2): 887-894
Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.887
Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.887
Ref. | Number | Treatment | Clinical trial | Objective response rate | Overall survival | |||
Grade of skin toxicity | P value | Grade of skin toxicity (mo) | P value | HR (95%CI) | ||||
Jonker et al[45] (2007) | 283 | Cetuximab | Phase III | - | - | 2.6 vs 4.8 vs 8.4 (grade 0 vs grade 1 vs≥ grade 2) | < 0.001 | - |
Van Cutsem et al[46] (2007) | 200 | Panitumumab + BSC | Phase III | 14% vs 86% (grade 1 vs grade 2-3) | - | ND | - | 0.59 (0.42-0.85) |
Cunningham et al[4] (2004) | 218 | IRI + cetuximab | Phase III | 6.3% vs 25.8% (grade 0 vs any grade) | 0.005 | 3.0 vs 9.1 (grade 0 vs any grade) | - | - |
111 | Cetuximab | 0% vs 13.0% (grade 0 vs any grade) | 2.5 vs 8.1 (grade 0 vs any grade) | - | - | |||
Sobrero et al[47] (2008) | 648 | IRI + cetuximab (2nd-line) | Phase III | - | - | 5.8 vs 11.7 vs 15.6 (grade 0 vs grade 1-2 vs≥ grade 3) | - | - |
Bokemeyer et al[48] (2009) | 169 | FOLFOX + cetuximab (1st-line) | Phase II | 13.0 vs 43.2% vs 53.2% vs 66.7% (grade 0 vs 1 vs 2 vs 3) | - | - | - | - |
Stintzing et al[41] (2013) | 149 | CAPIRI/CapOX + cetuximab (1st-line) | Phase II | 41% vs 62% (grade 0-1 vs grade 2-3) | 0.021 | 18.0 vs 30.3 (grade 0-1 vs grade 2-3) | 0.161 | 0.75 (0.50-1.12) |
- Citation: Kubo A, Hashimoto H, Takahashi N, Yamada Y. Biomarkers of skin toxicity induced by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody treatment in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(2): 887-894
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i2/887.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.887