Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2016; 22(2): 546-556
Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.546
Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.546
Ref. | Harvested lymph nodes (n) | P value | Distal resection margin (cm) | P value | Positive CRM (%) | P value | |||
ROB | LAP | ROB | LAP | ROB | LAP | ||||
Park et al[58] | 17.3 | 14.2 | 0.06 | 2.1 | 2.3 | NS | 4.9 | 3.7 | 0.5 |
Kang et al[33] | 14.7 | 16.6 | NS | 2.7 | 2.6 | 0.09 | 3 | 2 | NS |
Kwak et al[59] | 20 | 21 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 0 | > 0.9 |
Baek et al[50] | 13 | 16 | 0.07 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 4.9 | 1 |
Bianchi et al[60] | 18 | 17 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0.9 |
Baik et al[17] | 18.4 | 18.7 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 7 | 8 | 0.7 |
Patriti et al[63] | 10.3 | 11.2 | > 0.05 | 2.1 | 435 | > 0.05 | 0 | 0 | NS |
- Citation: Biffi R, Luca F, Bianchi PP, Cenciarelli S, Petz W, Monsellato I, Valvo M, Cossu ML, Ghezzi TL, Shmaissany K. Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(2): 546-556
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i2/546.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.546