Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2016; 22(2): 546-556
Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.546
Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.546
Ref. | n | BMI (kg/m2) | OR time (min) | Conversion rate | Anastomotic leak rate |
Hellan et al[16] | 39 | 26 (16-44) | 285 (180-540) | 1 (2.6) | 4 (12.1) |
Baik et al[17] | 56 | 23.4 (18-33) | 178 (120-315) | 0 | 1 (1.8) |
Choi et al[18] | 50 | 23.2 (19.4-29.2)1 | 304.8 (190-485)3 | 0 | 4 (8.3) |
Baek et al[19] | 64 | 26.8 (16.5-44) | 270 (150-540) | 9.4 | 4 (7.7) |
Pigazzi et al[15] (multicentric study) | 143 | 26.5 (16.5-44)2 | 297 (90-660)3 | 7 (4.9) | 16 (10.5) |
Baik et al[20] | 370 | 23.3 ± 2.9 (13.8-32.7)2 | 363.3 ± 94.8 (138.0-702.0)2 | 3 (0.8) | 28 (7.7) |
IEO series[14] | 102 | 28.2 (17.6-43) | 330 (155-540) | 2 (1.9) | 5 (6.6) |
- Citation: Biffi R, Luca F, Bianchi PP, Cenciarelli S, Petz W, Monsellato I, Valvo M, Cossu ML, Ghezzi TL, Shmaissany K. Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(2): 546-556
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i2/546.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.546