Topic Highlight
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2016; 22(2): 519-533
Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.519
Table 3 Hepatic arterial infusion plus systemic chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting
Ref.Numbers of patientsSettingRandomized studyRegimes of therapyOutcomes
DFSPFSOS/DSS
Controlled studies
Ota et al[115], 199984 (37 vs 47)Cohort studyNOHAI/5-FU vs control group5-yr DFS: 72.6% vs 29.8% (P = 0.0005)-5-yr OS:61.4% vs 28% (P = 0.0069)
Kemeny et al[112], 2005156 (74 vs 82)Phase IIIYESHAI/FUDR plus systemic 5-FU ± LV vs systemic 5-FU ± LV alone-Median PFS: 31.3 vs 17.2 mo (P = 0.02)Median OS:68.4 vs 58.8 mo (P = 0.10)
House et al[113], 2011250 (125 vs 125)Cohort studyNOHAI/FUDR plus systemic chemotherapy (5FU/LV + irinotecan or oxaliplatin) vs systemic chemotherapy alone5-yr DFS: 48% vs 25% (P < 0.01)HR = 0.71 (95%CI: 0.48-0.96)-5-yr DSS:75% vs 55% (P < 0.01) HR = 0.39 (95%CI: 0.23-0.68)
Goéré et al[116], 201398 (44 vs 54)Cohort studyNOHAI/oxaliplatin plus systemic 5-FU/LV vs systemic irinotecan regimes or oxaliplatin regimes alone3-yr DFS: 33% vs 5%(P < 0.0001) HR = 0.37 (95%CI: 0.23-0.60)-3-yr OS:75% vs 62% (P = 0.17) 5-yr OS:54% vs 52% (P = 0.34)
Non controlled studies
Alberts et al[114], 201055Phase II single armedNOHAI/FUDR plus systemic capecitabine + oxaliplatin2-yr DFS:59.7% Median DFS: 32.7 mo-2-yr OS:89.10%