Frontier
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2016; 22(2): 471-489
Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.471
Table 1 Completed randomized Phase II and Phase III trials
TargetAgentsName of trial and settingPhaseNumber of patientsPFS (mo)P valueOS (mo)P valueResults
HER-2Fluoropyrimide/cisplain + Trastuzumab vs Fluoropyrimide/cisplainToGA, First lineIII5946.7 vs 5·5< 0.00113.8 vs 11.10.004PFS and OS was improved
HER-2Lapatinib plus once-per-week paclitaxel vs paclitaxelTYTAN, Second lineIII2615.4 vs 4.40.85011.0 vs 8.90.104No effect on PFS and OS
HER-2Cap/Ox plus lapatinib or Cap/Ox plus placeboLOGiC, First lineIII5456.0 vs 5.40.10012.2 vs 10.50.350No effect on PFS and OS
EGFRCisplatin and capecitabine + cetuximab vs cisplatin and capecitabineEXPAND, First lineIII9044.4 vs 5.60.3209·4 vs 10.70.950No effect on PFS and OS
EGFRmEOC plus panitumumab vs EOCREAL, First lineIII5536.0 vs 7.40.0688·8 vs 11.30.013No effect on PFS and OS
VEGFBevacizumab plus cisp/cape/fluorouracil vs plc plus cisplatin/capecitabine/fluorouracilAVAGAST, First lineIII7746.7 vs 5.30.00312.1 vs 10.10.100PFS was improved, No effect on OS
VEGFRamucirumab vs placeboREGARD, Second lineIII3552.1 vs 1.3< 0.0015.2 vs 3.80.047PFS and OS was improved
VEGFRamucirumab plus paclitaxel vs placebo plus paclitaxelRAINBOW, Second lineIII6654.4 vs 2.9< 0.0019.6 vs 7·40.017PFS and OS was improved
VEGFApatinib 850 mg vs apatinib 425 vs placeboNN, Third lineII1443.67 vs 3.20 vs 1.40< 0.0014.83 vs 4.27 vs 2.50< 0.001PFS and OS was improved
METRilotumumab 15 mg/kg per rilotumumab 7.5 mg/kg, or placebo plus ECXNN, First lineII1215.1 vs 6.8 vs 4.20.0169.7 vs 11.1 vs 8.90.100PFS and OS was improved
m-TOREverolimus 10 mg vs placeboGRANITE, ≥ Second lineIII6561.7 vs 1.40.7805.4 vs 4.30.124No effect on PFS and OS