Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio predicts survival after radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastases

doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i16.4211

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 22, Issue 16

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7887)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

516

WORD

343

HTML

3843

Figures (1-2)

184

Tables (1-3)

186

Sum=5072

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1107

Download

1708

Sum=2815

Apr 28, 2016 (publication date) through Jul 27, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (47)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2016; 22(16): 4211-4218
Published online Apr 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i16.4211

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Scatter plot of log Hazard Ratios for overall survival plotted against Lymphocyte-to-neutrophil ratios. The most significant cut-off value LMR was 3.96%. HR: Hazard ratio; LMR: Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio.

Citation: Facciorusso A, Del Prete V, Crucinio N, Serviddio G, Vendemiale G, Muscatiello N. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio predicts survival after radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(16): 4211-4218
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i16/4211.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i16.4211