Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2016; 22(14): 3793-3802
Published online Apr 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i14.3793
Table 2 Procedures, adverse events, and causes of dysfunction in patients who underwent preoperative plastic stent and nasobiliary catheter placement n (%)
All patients (n = 419)PS (n = 253)NBC (n = 166)P value
Procedures of the initial ERCP
EST or EPBD178 (43)101 (40)77 (46)0.202
Biopsy or brushing of the bile duct362 (86)214 (85)148 (89)0.234
Positive for cancer250 (60)150 (59)100 (60)
Biliary stents/catheters placed
Diameter 5-6/7-7.5/8.5-10 Fr98/236/85 (23/56/20)18/150/85 (7/59/34)80/86/0 (48/52/0)< 0.001
Pig-tailed tip/straight tip152/224174/177 (29/71)78/47 (62/38)< 0.001
Placement of pancreatic stent41 (10)25 (10)16 (10)0.935
Adverse events (other than cholangitis)
Pancreatitis40 (10)26 (10)14 (8)0.612
Mild/moderate/severe30/10/0
Cholecystitis4 (1)2 (1)2 (1)0.650
Others4 (1)2 (1)2 (1)0.650
Stent/catheter dysfunction118 (36)88 (35)30 (18)< 0.001
Causes of PS/NBC dysfunction
Occlusion or cholangitis8569 (27)16 (10)0.013
Insufficient drainage1914 (6)5 (3)0.330
Migration105 (2)5 (3)0.526
Inadvertent removal4NA4 (2)NA
Number of ERCPs2 (1-2)1 (1-1)2 (1-2)< 0.0001

  • Citation: Sasahira N, Hamada T, Togawa O, Yamamoto R, Iwai T, Tamada K, Kawaguchi Y, Shimura K, Koike T, Yoshida Y, Sugimori K, Ryozawa S, Kakimoto T, Nishikawa K, Kitamura K, Imamura T, Mizuide M, Toda N, Maetani I, Sakai Y, Itoi T, Nagahama M, Nakai Y, Isayama H. Multicenter study of endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(14): 3793-3802
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i14/3793.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i14.3793