Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2016; 22(12): 3460-3470
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3460
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3460
Figure 3 Cost-effectiveness plane for different combinations of optimal, suboptimal initial ages and inter-screening intervals of ultrasonography screening.
The slope of the dashed line represents the ceiling ratio. A: Annual screening from 40 years vs no screening; B: Annual screening from 50 years vs no screening; C: Biennial screening from 40 years vs no screening; D: Biennial screening from 50 years vs no screening.
- Citation: Kuo MJ, Chen HH, Chen CL, Fann JCY, Chen SLS, Chiu SYH, Lin YM, Liao CS, Chang HC, Lin YS, Yen AMF. Cost-effectiveness analysis of population-based screening of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparing ultrasonography with two-stage screening. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(12): 3460-3470
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i12/3460.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3460