Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2016; 22(12): 3355-3362
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3355
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3355
Table 1 Detection rate for the simulated polyps by ultrasound virtual endoscopy, computed tomography colonography and optical colonoscopy
| Actual polyp size, mm | Referenced No. of polyps | OC | CTC | USVE | |||
| No. of detected polyps | Sensitivity | No. of detected polyps | Sensitivity | No. of detected polyps | Sensitivity | ||
| ≤ 5 | 9 | 9 | 100% | 8 | 88.9% | 9 | 100% |
| 6-9 | 15 | 15 | 100% | 15 | 100% | 14 | 93.3% |
| ≥ 10 | 6 | 6 | 100% | 6 | 100% | 6 | 100% |
| All | 30 | 30 | 100% | 29 | 96.7% | 29 | 96.7% |
- Citation: Liu JY, Chen LD, Cai HS, Liang JY, Xu M, Huang Y, Li W, Feng ST, Xie XY, Lu MD, Wang W. Ultrasound virtual endoscopy: Polyp detection and reliability of measurement in an in vitro study with pig intestine specimens. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(12): 3355-3362
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i12/3355.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3355