Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2016; 22(12): 3325-3334
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3325
Table 2 Tumor markers and the cut-off of different selection criteria
MarkersAuthorsCut-offOther contentSurvival (5-yr)
OSRFS
AFPZheng et al[12]AFP ≤ 400Hangzhou criteria78.3%62.4%
Toso et al[27]AFP ≤ 400Total tumor volume ≤ 115 cm3NoneNone
Wan et al[20]AFP ≤ 400Tumor ≤ 10 cm, no vascular and extrahepatic invasions73.7%74.4%
DCPIto et al[6]DCP ≤ 400Tumor size ≤ 10 cm86.7%None
Soejima et al[13]DCP ≤ 300Tumor size ≤ 5 cmNone93.8% (3-yr)
NLRXiao et al[43]NLR < 4None61.5%60.7%
AFP/CA199Wan et al[30]AFP ≤ 400, CA199 ≤ 400None74.6%78.5%
NLR/CRPNa et al[47]NLR < 6.0 or CRP < 1.0NoneNoneNone
DCP/AFPTodo et al[35]DCP ≤ 100, AFP ≤ 200Milan criteriaNone96.4%
Shindoh et al[36]AFP ≤ 250, DCP ≤ 450Tokyo criteria84.0%96.8%